π Example Decision: What to Do About a Declining Product Line
This is a guided example of using Confab to decide what to do with a legacy product that has seen steadily declining sales and user engagement. It demonstrates multi-stakeholder collaboration, option comparison, and metric-driven decision making.
π¦ Step 1: Define the Decisionβ
Confab Name:
Future of Legacy Product Alpha
Description:
Sales and usage of Product Alpha have dropped significantly over the past year. We must decide whether to reinvest, reposition, bundle it, sunset it, or modernize it.
Stakeholders:
- Sarah β Product Manager
- Jamir β Sales Lead
- Anika β Customer Success Lead
- Devon β Finance Lead
π© Step 2: Add Optionsβ
Add options using the Quick Create interface or collaboratively via a NoteBlock.
| Option | Summary |
|---|---|
| Reinvest in Marketing | Run aggressive campaigns to regain traction |
| Reposition the Product | Retarget to a different audience or use case |
| Bundle with Other Products | Package with newer offerings for added value |
| Sunset the Product | Phase it out cleanly with a migration plan |
| Pivot Development Focus | Invest in modernizing the product |
π¨ Step 3: Add Option Attributesβ
Use attributes to compare options on cost, effort, and expected outcomes.
| Option | π° Cost ($) | β±οΈ Time to Implement | π ROI (12mo) | βοΈ Internal Effort | π Customer Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reinvest in Marketing | 50,000 | 1 month | 1.3x | Medium | Mixed |
| Reposition the Product | 30,000 | 2 months | 1.5x | Medium | Mixed |
| Bundle with Other Products | 20,000 | 1 month | 1.4x | Low | Positive |
| Sunset the Product | 10,000 | 3 months | 2.0x* | Low | Negative/Mixed |
| Pivot Development Focus | 120,000 | 6 months | 2.5x* | High | Positive |
*Assumes successful implementation and market fit.
π₯ Step 4: Collaborate & Compareβ
Use Confab's tools to evaluate and debate the options:
- π¬ Comment threads under each option
- π Scatterplot comparing Cost vs ROI
- πΈοΈ Radar chart showing internal effort vs impact
- π Pro/Con lists gathered from user notes
- π― Tag highlights like "Quick Win" or "High Risk"
πͺ Final Decision & Votesβ
β Recommended Decision:β
Bundle with Other Products, monitor for retention lift over the next 3 months. Reassess based on customer sentiment before pivoting dev focus.
π³οΈ Votes Summary:β
| Option | π Yes | π No |
|---|---|---|
| Bundle | 3 | 1 |
| Sunset | 2 | 2 |
| Pivot Dev | 1 | 3 |
| Reinvest in Marketing | 0 | 4 |
| Reposition the Product | 2 | 2 |
π‘ Confab Tips for This Exampleβ
- Use weighted scoring if ROI matters most to your team.
- Compare stakeholder votes vs actual outcomes after 3β6 months.
- Use a Decision NoteBlock to track final actions, follow-ups, and what was learned.